More lies, more war: Americans fall for it again

In 2015, during the Republican presidential primaries, Donald Trump stood on stage with Jeb Bush and said to his face, “The war in Iraq was a big, fat mistake… We spent $2 trillion, thousands of lives… We should have never been in Iraq… We have destabilized the Middle East… They lie. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, there were none, and they knew there were none.” 

At the time, the establishment Republican audience booed, but a star was born. Jeb Bush’s political fortunes soon crumbled. A new narrative took hold of the party. Gone would be the neoconservatives and the Bush family, replaced by a more isolationist, nationalist, “America First” movement led by Trump.

Now, with his attacks on Iran just a few months into his second presidential term, Trump is on the verge of making a catastrophic foreign policy move that threatens to dwarf the illegality, murderousness, and destabilization of the Bush Administration’s crime of the century.  

Trump  is, and always has been, a warmonger, despite his occasional pretense of peace. In 2016 he called the Geneva Conventions, the protocols that prohibit certain war crimes, “the problem.” And he has always been hawkish on Iran, appointing fanatics John Bolton and Mike Pompeo to senior positions in his first administration and assassinating a top Iranian general, Qasem Soleimani. Among other crimes, Trump also dramatically expanded the use of President Obama’s drone program, including in Yemen, Somalia, and Syria, killing as many as 7,500 civilians.

But before the last couple weeks, Trump was not beyond the norm in Washington in this regard, and in some ways was actually more restrained than previous administrations. That all may be changing, and Trump might yet make his name in foreign policy infamy. 

A brief timeline of Iran nuclear hysteria

While tensions between Iran and Israel/the US have simmered for decades, things escalated on June 13, when Israeli drones bombed multiple nuclear, residential, and military targets throughout Iran. This first attack occurred while Iran was waiting on diplomatic talks with the US. Then, Trump gave Iran two weeks to return to the negotiating table – and attacked them two days later, bombing three nuclear sites. Now, far beyond simply arming and covering for Israel, the US military is directly involved.

The claimed justification for these attacks is to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Iran’s alleged nuclear program has been a fixation of Israel and imperial Washington for decades, but the claims are difficult to take seriously. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been fearmongering about Iranian nukes for more than 30 years. As far back as 1992, he has appeared before various legislative and world bodies to proclaim Iran was on the threshold of obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Trump’s own intelligence services undermine this claim. Appearing before Congress in March of 2025, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said, “The [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” In characteristic fashion, Trump simply swatted this aside, saying, “The intelligence community is wrong… she’s wrong.” Trump needs no evidence to support his claims; his word is more than enough.

Iran’s lack of a nuclear weapons program actually shows remarkable restraint on their part. Trump has done everything in his power to drive them to nuclear armament. Between his hostile rhetoric, his shredding of the Iran nuclear agreement in 2018, and now his outright acts of war, he could very well inspire Iran, and other Middle East states, to acquire nuclear weapons as a deterrent against a belligerent United States.

While there’s no evidence for Israel’s claim that Iran would use nukes to murder Israelis, it’s a bit of a rich accusation considering the source. Israel holds an estimated 90 illegal nuclear weapons themselves, in contravenance of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and is currently carrying out an active genocide of the people of Gaza as well as attacks against multiple neighbors. Their moral authority is less than zero.

Of course Iran shouldn’t have nuclear weapons. Nobody should. But we can’t unilaterally declare war against anyone who might, theoretically, one day possess them. If that was our logic, Trump should just kill everyone on Earth right now to prevent any of us from ever acquiring nuclear weapons.

Now that the war machine is running at full speed, the reasons hardly matter. Just like when Bush invaded Iraq, the goalposts and motivations will shift. They can pull their favorite justification out of a hat: Iran is undemocratic, Iran treats women or gays or Christians or Jews badly, Iran is a state sponsor of terror. The nuance and truth of any given claim, and whether any of them justify all-out war, doesn’t matter once the war drums start beating.

Trump sells his war with the deep state propaganda machine

So the justification is a blatant lie on one hand and a gross hypocrisy on the other. But that hasn’t stopped the pro-war fervor from dominating on cable news and right-wing internet media.

The echoes of the Bush-era propaganda blitz are resounding. Back in 2002, that administration began making the case for an invasion of Iraq using any excuse they could make up, from connecting Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to 9/11 to simply saying, “They hate us for our freedom.” Despite the embarrassing failure and criminality of it all, plenty of the same actors are making similar arguments now. Unlike that effort, though, which involved presenting a comprehensive, if fabricated, case to the American people, Congress, and the UN, Trump has taken these actions unilaterally.

Still, he has received reflexive support from the corporate press. One remarkable headline on FOX News read, “Iran attacks Israel despite US strikes on nuclear sites, Trump calls for peace.” A reader would have no way of knowing from that article any of the relevant context, or even that Israel and the US started the war. Networks and news outlets have also taken to featuring Reza Pahlavi, the son of the Shah of Iran, the brutal, CIA-installed former dictator. FOX News even refers to him as “his royal highness.” 

Even some of the pretend antiwar MAGA talking heads have done about-faces. Days before Trump’s attack, Charlie Kirk posted on Twitter about the foolishness of regime change in Iran and how 60% of Americans opposed the US getting involved. Once the US started dropping bombs, Kirk tweeted, “President Trump acted for the betterment of humanity… trust our Commander in Chief.” Trump has since openly declared his intent to pursue regime change in Iran.

Expect severe anti-Iranian propaganda to escalate going forward. Iranians will be dehumanized and characterized as brutal murderers. The US and Israel will be the good guys, Iran will be the terror-sponsoring villain, no matter who actually does what. We will see images of bombed Israeli and US buildings and assets, but never Iranian ones. We will mourn lives lost on our side and ignore any lost on theirs. That’s how it goes. When the deep state wants war, it rallies the entirety of corporate media behind itself. Truth, as they say, will be the first casualty.

Creating a more dangerous world

There’s no way to tell where things go from here. It could go no further, but with Trump apparently set on regime change and Iran vowing retaliation, it seems to be headed toward a full-scale, boots-on-the-ground war. The world waits with baited breath on the precipice of a possible nuclear World War III. 

Compared to Iraq, Iran is much bigger, more populous, more powerful, and better-connected in the global community. They are allied with America’s rival nuclear superpowers, China and Russia. So the fallout of any major war is likely to be many times greater than the fallout from the Iraq War – which the world is still dealing with and will be for generations. Hundreds of thousands of lost lives, millions of refugees, the growth of more and deadlier militant Islamic groups, and all at a $3 trillion price tag. Multiply it all if full-scale war breaks out with Iran.

We will live with the burden of the sins of our presidents for the rest of our lives, and the world is a more dangerous place because of them. As the children and friends and families of people killed by American bombs, whether in Iraq or Iran or Gaza or anywhere, come of age, they may not be quick to forgive or forget. 

Trump used diplomacy as a ruse, twice, to catch Iran off guard. They have no reason, nor does any other nation, to listen to anything America ever says again. More than that, it could inspire enemy nations to pursue nukes as a deterrent. After seeing Trump’s behavior, they’d almost be foolish not to. North Korea’s nukes are probably the only thing that has kept us from attacking them.

If a war breaks out, we will, by most measures, almost certainly lose it, just as we lost in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other Middle East boondoggles. The Iranian people do not want their country to be an American client state. They will not, just as the Iraqis did not, welcome us as liberators and thank us for our bombs. If Iran bombed three US nuclear sites, American patriotism would shoot through the roof. The same is, predictably and justifiably, happening in Iran.

With his determination to start an all-out war and pursue regime change in Iran, Trump has transformed into the worst kind of neocon he always pretended to hate. His followers have, sadly yet predictably, hung onto him and will come along for the ride. Without intense activism to turn things around fast, all signs are pointing to much more death and devastation to come, lasting generations, destroying families, destabilizing regions, bankrupting the country, and ruining what’s left of our national soul.

In Gaza, a Genocide by Any Other Name

A crowd gathers around bodybags of all sizes laid out in Gaza.

For more than 100 days, Israel has been relentlessly bombing, starving, dehumanizing, and denying aid to the people in the Gaza Strip. In terms of scale and proportionality, it’s one of the most brutal assaults in memory. It’s being done in broad daylight with funding from the American taxpayer and the full support of the American political and media class.

On January 11, South Africa presented a genocide case against Israel at the United Nations’ International Court of Justice at the Hague. Their case was persuasive, outlining a long list of war crimes and genocidal rhetoric from top Israeli officials.

Despite this flurry of negative attention, Israel has carried on undeterred and Western governments have maintained their support. America and the Biden Administration continue to fund the assault and have even supported it with direct military action.

The situation feels helpless. It’s a tragedy unfolding in real time, with live updates from victims and reporters. Every day brings a new horror, and the supposed moral arbiters of the free world are looking humanity in the eyes and saying, “We’re doing this, and there isn’t a thing you can do about it.”

The case against Israel

Whether Israel’s actions in Gaza constitute genocide is a matter of ongoing debate. The United Nations’ definition of genocide includes, “…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

  1. Killing members of the group;
  2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
  3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
  4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
  5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

The first three of these are almost a given. More than 25,000 people have been killed in Gaza since October 7 and another 58,000 have been injured. Around 70% of the dead are civilian women and children. On average, Israeli strikes kill one child in Gaza every 15 minutes. The actual numbers are believed to be much higher as bodies lie uncounted under the rubble. In a population of just 2.3 million, this equates to more than one out of every 100 people killed, and the numbers grow every day.

Among the victims have been United Nations officials and healthcare professionals. Entire families have been wiped out, including babies. Israel bombed a UN aid convoy and has slaughtered refugees fleeing along evacuation routes Israel itself ordered them to take. They’ve killed people waiting in line for humanitarian aid. They’ve shot shirtless people waving white flags who turned out to be their own hostages. And they’ve killed more than 110 journalists – more in three months than were killed in the entirety of World War II.

Israel’s wanton, indiscriminate bombing campaign has annihilated schools, neighborhoods, homes, places of worship, UN compounds, and hospitals. They have alleged that these facilities are being used as secret bases by Hamas – but those claims have proven thin at best. By some estimates, half of all buildings in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed by Israeli shells. Some 1.9 million Gazans have been displaced, a staggering 85 percent of the region’s population.

The World Health Organization reports that virtually everyone in Gaza faces “crisis levels of hunger.” Facilities and infrastructure have been demolished. Diseases are running rampant amid the deplorable sanitation conditions, horrific overcrowding and lack of healthcare. The Israeli siege prevents Gazans from accessing goods, basic aid, electricity, and vital services. The UN’s Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, Martin Griffiths, declared in a briefing to the Security Council that in Gaza, “Dignified human life is a near impossibility.”

In addition, Israel is waging a psychological war. A recent report shows that the IDF has desecrated 16 gravesites in Gaza, digging up bodies and smashing gravestones. They’ve stripped detained Gazans to their underwear and marched them through the streets. Israeli soldiers have posted videos to social media bragging about their murderous rampage or sadistically mocking the victims.

Devastation in Gaza is almost total. Everywhere is death, disease, starvation, and destruction.

But proving genocide requires proving intent. All this carnage could be, and often is, dismissed by Israel as collateral damage in a righteous war against Hamas. Even if everyone in Gaza winds up dead, that isn’t necessarily enough to convict Israel.

However, it isn’t hard to find high-level Israeli officials or their Western allies dehumanizing Gazans and making genocidal declarations. Here’s a small sampling:

  • Defense Minister Yoav Gallant: “I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed… We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”
  • Israel President Isaac Herzog, implying everyone in Gaza shares culpability for the terror attack on October 7: “It is an entire nation out there that is responsible… It is not true this rhetoric about civilians not being aware, not involved.”
  • Agriculture Minister Avi Dicther, referencing the 1948 Nakba in which 750,000 Palestinians were violently removed from their homes or killed to make way for the State of Israel’s founding: “We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba… Gaza Nakba 2023. That’s how it’ll end.”
  • Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, advocating the permanent removal of Gazans from their homes: “I welcome the initiative of the voluntary emigration of Gaza Arabs to countries around the world… The State of Israel will no longer be able to accept the existence of an independent entity in Gaza.”

The Israeli defense

The day after South Africa presented its genocide case, Israel dismissed the charges as “grossly distorted” and argued they have only acted in self-defense. They insisted they were fighting a war against Hamas, not the Palestinian people, and rejected calls to stop the assault.  One common refrain from Israel supporters and Israel itself has been, “Israel has a right to defend itself” – and they claim everything they’ve done since October 7 has been to that end.

The decades-long story of Israeli occupation and violence in Gaza has been largely set aside in this discourse. It really shouldn’t be – it’s essential to understanding the current conflict.

In the current narrative, everything began on October 7, when Israel was attacked by armed members of Hamas, Gaza’s governing militia. The details of October 7 were horrific: Hamas stood accused of slaughtering civilians, taking hostages, committing mass rape, and decapitating babies. While some of the more sensational allegations are disputed, no one disputes that Hamas killed innocent Israelis.

But even if you treat October 7 as an out-of-the-blue terror attack, what the IDF is doing in Gaza goes far beyond self-defense. Hamas killed 1,139 people during its attack. Of these, 68% were civilians. Not only has Israel killed more than 20 times that number of Gazans, a greater proportion of them have been civilians. In other words, the Hamas attack was slightly more focused on military targets.

People who flippantly tout the self-defense argument either don’t understand the scale of destruction in Gaza or they’re trying to imply that Israel has a right to murder anyone it thinks might one day pose a problem – even if that person is only a child.

Israel and its defenders have also resorted to censorship and bringing up irrelevant counterpoints – for instance, suggesting that South Africa is acting as “the legal arm of the Hamas terror organization.” Even if that were true, it says nothing about the charges and the evidence.

Antisemitism and censorship

Another not-insignificant tactic of Israel defenders has been, unfortunately, to accuse opponents of antisemitism.

Much of the discussion conflates and confuses the State of Israel, the religion of Judaism, the Jewish people, and Zionism – the movement to establish and, nowadays, expand a homeland for Jews. Jumbling these concepts has the effect of turning criticism of any one of them into antisemitic criticism of them all. In supposing that Jews, Israel, and Zionism are inseparable from one another, even human rights advocacy on behalf of Palestinians becomes antisemitism.

This has led to the stigmatization and even criminalization of the phrase, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” Popular at demonstrations, the phrase refers to the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, which is currently shared by Israel and what’s left of Palestine. Propagandists are taking the most uncharitable possible interpretation of the slogan to smear protesters and college students worldwide as irredeemable, terror-supporting antisemites. Ironically, a pro-Israel variation of the phrase is used by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ruling Likud Party without mainstream controversy.

Censorship of phrases like “from the river to the sea” and “decolonization” is less about protecting everyday Jews from bigotry and more about discrediting criticism of Israel and its assault on Gaza. However, everyday Jews may actually be suffering because of it. Agencies worldwide have reported a rise in both antisemitic and Islamophobic hate crimes. It’s cowardly, disingenuous, and dangerous for Israel and its defenders to put the Jewish people between themselves and their accusers while they commit war crimes.

It’s also important to note that countless Jews have raised their voices, often quite bravely and at enormous personal risk, in opposition to Israel’s assault on Gaza. Here’s a sample:

  • Ofer Cassif, a member of Israel’s legislative body Knesset, is risking expulsion for speaking out against the Gaza assault.
  • The group Rabbis4Ceasefire has led marches and a prayer protest at the United Nations.
  • Author and 87-year-old Holocaust survivor Marione Ingram called for a ceasefire and protested outside the White House.
  • The Guardian reported on multiple Jewish groups that condemned the harsh treatment of Gazans by Israel.
  • Norman Finkelstein, the son of two Holocaust survivors, is one of the planet’s most outspoken and well-informed critics of the war.
  • Tal Mitnick, an 18-year-old conscientious objector in Israel, was jailed for refusing to take part in the Gaza genocide.

It’s deeply cynical and unfair to label criticism of Israel’s actions or support for Palestinians as antisemitic. It’s also deeply unfair to hold Israel’s actions and the statements of its politicians against the Jewish people. Antisemitism is an ancient blight on mankind that should be stamped out wherever it emerges. Opposition to violent military occupations is a proud tradition that should be celebrated wherever it emerges.

US President Joe Biden and Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu.

Israel’s genocidal co-defendant: The United States

For many Americans, the shame of this situation arises from our complicity in it. Aside from some occasional finger-wagging and suggestions that Israel ought to “be more careful” about killing so many children, the Biden Administration has been ironclad in its support of Israel since the assault on Gaza began.

Since the 1970s, the US has given Israel more than $130 billion in military aid. We have also funded Israel’s scientific and technological advancement and its economic growth. For the last 20 years, we have given Israel between $2.4 and $3.8 billion annually. After the Gaza assault started, President Biden pledged $14.3 billion in military aid to Israel and made it clear he would impose zero restrictions on how they chose to use all that weaponry. The US also provided the white phosphorous that Israel has allegedly used to commit war crimes and sold Israel $106 million of tank shells.

Now, the US is moving from arms dealer to active participant. Together with the UK and others, the US has been bombing the Houthis in Yemen. The Houthis are an Islamic militia that controls large parts of Yemen. They’d begun attacking commercial vessels in the Red Sea in an attempt to disrupt the shipment of supplies to Israel. Now, the US has effectively gone to war with one of the poorest nations on Earth to open shipping lanes for a country accused of genocide. Perversely, the Houthis are actually the ones acting in accordance with international law, which obligates states to “take measures to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide.” The international community is pleading for de-escalation as fighting threatens to extend throughout the Middle East and beyond.

The Biden Administration is also running diplomatic cover for Israel. The US has vetoed UN Security Council resolutions calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby called the South Africa genocide case “meritless, counterproductive, and completely without any basis in fact whatsoever.”

And Biden is doing all this at his own political peril. He’s about to have a rematch for the presidency against Donald Trump, who leads him in polls. Meanwhile Biden’s support among many of his core constituencies, especially young people and Muslim-Americans, has cratered since the Gaza assault began. There is zero reason to expect that Trump will offer any greater wisdom or morality on this issue, but voters can’t bring themselves to support the man they’ve nicknamed Genocide Joe.

Where do we go from here?

Whether you call it a war, an assault, or a genocide, what Israel is doing to Gaza can’t last forever. Soon there won’t be anything remaining of Gaza to attack. Without immense international pressure, applied swiftly, all that will be left is to write the history.

Netanyahu and his top officials are crystal clear. Their goal is “full Israeli security control over all the territory west of Jordan” – in other words, Israeli domination from the river to the sea. Netanyahu has flatly refused to consider a two-state solution, the long-sought resolution that would create two sovereign states, Israel and Palestine. Increasingly, it seems unlikely that there’ll even be a one-state solution – that is, a single state where Israelis and Palestinians coexist peacefully with shared, equal rights.

A judgment from the International Court of Justice could take years. Even if the court convicts Israel, it has no enforcement powers. The US can simply veto, as it has in the past, any Security Council resolution requesting that Israel stop its assault.

It’s never too late for peace. No matter how much damage has been done, it would be better if the fighting stopped. Anyone with any means at their disposal, whether it’s protests, letter-writing, petition-signing, boycotting, or even voting, can pressure their leaders to impose sanctions and diplomatic measures. Perhaps, with enough action from activists and the international community, the genocide can be stopped before it’s completed.

This article only catalogues evidence from more or less reputable news sites. Underneath all the lies, coverups, and sanitization there almost certainly lie even greater horrors. One day, Western institutions will have to pretend they didn’t know what was happening, pretend there weren’t countless videos of Palestinians clutching their dead and dying loved ones, pretend they weren’t warned by human rights organizations and journalists.

There’s no one left in Gaza who hasn’t been displaced, gone hungry, lost a relative, and/or been blown to bits. If that isn’t a genocide, it’s hard to know what is. The psychological toll has been profound and will last generations – if there are future generations left to feel it. Whoever does survive will harbor deep, long-lasting animosities for Israel and the US for the carnage visited on them. Many of them will likely respond to the violence they’ve experienced with violence of their own. They will never forgive us, because what we’ve done is unforgivable.

Whatever you call it, hardly anything on Earth today is as clear-cut and morally unambiguous as Israel’s assault on the Gaza Strip. And the USA, President Biden, establishment Washington, and mainstream media are firmly on the wrong side of it.