Republicans slowly rehabilitating “fascist” as an approved political identity

Vice President JD Vance, who defended Young Republicans declaring their love for Hitler as just edgy comedy.

For the last few weeks, Republican Party leadership has been carrying out a campaign to, essentially, classify the word “fascist” as hate speech against right-wingers. But while some Republicans shy away from the term, plenty of others, particularly among their base and their influencers, find it edgy and hip. Some have even begun to wear it as a badge of honor.

Most notably, last week, members of the Republican Youth — er, Young Republicans — were caught in a group chat declaring their love of Adolf Hitler and expressing fondness for his policy of mass extermination in gas chambers. 

The incident caused some drama and led to some repercussions, but not as much as you might hope. Vice President JD Vance dismissed the story, saying, “Kids do stupid things, especially young boys… They tell edgy, offensive jokes. And I really don’t want us to grow up in a country where a kid telling a… very offensive, stupid joke is cause to ruin their lives.” By and large, that seems to be the tack most Republicans are taking, certainly from the top-down.

Vance’s attempt to downplay the chats as just kids being edgy may work for some, but the truth is that many members of the chat were grown men well into their 30s, nearly Vance’s age, who occupied positions of political influence. Maybe they were joking, but it’s not clear where the irony or the punchlines were – and it’s a poor choice of comedic material if the party wants to shake the fascist label.

“Fascist” as hate speech

Ever since President Donald Trump’s takeover of the GOP, Republicans have struggled with this fascist comparison. Actually, the left has used the term to describe far-right policies since long before Trump, but Trump’s Mussolini-like mannerisms, dictatorial ambitions, and cult of personality have made the term feel like a natural fit and brought it into more common use, especially in his second term.

After the assassination of Charlie Kirk in September, Republicans like Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson blamed the casual use of the word for inspiring Kirk’s murder and other acts of violence. Johnson said, “Calling people Nazis and fascists is not helpful… There are some deranged people in society, and when they see leaders using that kind of language… it spurs them on to action. We have to recognize that reality and address it appropriately.”

It was also around this time that they began to escalate their campaign against “antifa,” characterizing it as a political organization and threatening to go after its organizers and funders. In truth, though, there is no formal group called antifa. Antifa is short for antifascism, and it exists only as an opposition to fascism. So Trump’s position of anti-antifascism, if you reduce the double negative, is simply fascism.

Maybe the most dramatic step so far in this anti-antifa campaign was Trump’s issuance of NSPM-7, a presidential memo that accuses people of using the word “fascist” as an excuse to “justify and encourage acts of violent revolution,” and further identifies “anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality” as indicia of potential terroristic inclinations and activities.

One can only guess how the administration is defining these terms, but if their actions to date are anything to go by, simple compassion might, in fact, be regarded as an unlawful, antifascist, terrorist thoughtcrime, and anyone who holds such views can be subject to, at a minimum, investigation, surveillance, and harassment by law enforcement – all of which sounds like anti-antifascism, to be sure.

Fascism defined

At this point, it’s important to examine just what, exactly, fascism is. The term has certainly been abused in America. For many, “fascist” has just become shorthand for “someone I don’t like,” or, more specifically, “someone who’s making me do something I don’t want to do.” To wit: Speed limits are fascism. No-smoking signs are fascism. Mask mandates during a pandemic are fascism. Taxes are fascism. And so on.

Alas, few historians would describe such basic laws or civic norms as fascism. While the word doesn’t have any one universally agreed upon definition, and even self-identified fascist societies differ in significant ways, there are a few hallmarks that distinguish fascism from other philosophies. The more of these qualities a government or a society has, the more fascistic it is:

  • The merger of state and corporate power. Italian dictator Benito Mussolini, who coined the term fascist, said this was the philosophy’s most defining tenet.
  • Authoritarian rule. Power concentrated in a leader with a devoted cult of personality, in whom people see a living embodiment of the nation.
  • Police state. A militarized society, including citizen militias and police suppression of protests, speech, and other forms of dissent.
  • Propaganda. Rampant propaganda that is rife with lies, conspiracy, and dehumanizing language.
  • Censorship. Dissent or open disagreement with official narratives and state policies may be outlawed and punished violently.
  • In-group vs. out-group. Hatred of “others,” especially immigrants, religious minorities, and the LGBTQ community, as well as any leftists and academics who support them.
  • National and cultural mythology. Desire to preserve or attain “purity” of culture, language, and/or race and ethnicity, often through appeals to a mythical past.
  • War. Jingoism and an aggressive foreign policy.
  • Obsession with aesthetics. From architecture to attire, everything intends to give an air of magnificence, superiority, and national pride, no matter how superficial.

Any honest observer can see how much of the definition fits. Not all of it is unique to Trump, but he does tick more boxes than the average politician. Soon enough, though, simply pointing that out might land you in a heap of trouble. Unless, of course, Republicans shift gears and decide to embrace the term, as at least some of them are beginning to do.

Reclaiming fascism as something edgy and cool

Back in July, before Trump ratcheted up his campaign against antifa, FOX News comedian Greg Gutfeld went on a revealing rant about his feelings on the word Nazi and how it relates to him. Gutfeld said on his show: “The criticism doesn’t matter to us when you call us Nazis. Nazi this and Nazi that… We need to learn from the Blacks. The way they were able to remove the power from the n-word by using it. So from now on it’s, ‘What up, my Nazi?’”

Gutfeld’s show is intended as a comedy, though you might not recognize it as one. Still, it’s a peculiar joke to make, and frightening to consider who it might resonate with. And this attitude on the right is being more openly embraced: That fascism is hip or edgy and that all the progress made on freedoms and rights for gays, trans people, minorities, and women needs to be rolled back. For instance:

  • The successful far-right influencer Matt Walsh calls himself a “theocratic fascist.” While Walsh has claimed it’s an ironic label used to troll his critics, if you pay any attention to what he says and compare it to what a “theocratic fascist” might say, you’ll find he fits the term quite comfortably. 
  • Another growing voice on the right, especially among the young, is Nick Fuentes, simply an unapologetic, loud and proud neo-Nazi who has dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago
  • Trump’s recent nominee to lead the Office of Special Counsel, Paul Ingrassia, recently had his text messages leaked where he espoused racist attitudes and said, “I do have a Nazi streak in me from time to time, I will admit it.” Ingrassia’s nomination has since been pulled, a relatively rare rebuke from this administration of that kind of conduct.
  • A cadre of right-wing influencers have also been trying to sanitize, justify, and even push for the return of chattel slavery. Chief among these is Joshua Haymes, a former pastor who counted among his congregation Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. Haymes recently said, “The institution of slavery is not inherently evil. It is not inherently evil to own another human being. It is very important that every Christian affirm what I just said.”

Republican influencers and the MAGA base are racing to the bottom, fast. It’s known as vice signaling: Each one trying to outdo the next in depravity to prove they are as un-woke and un-PC as possible, even if it reverts them back to plain-old KKK and neo-Nazi hatred and barbarism. It’s hard to say what abuse, constitutional violation, or act of violence they won’t enthusiastically push for, as long as it’s coming from the right side and being inflicted on an enemy. These aren’t ideas we have to debate. This is fascism, and civilized society already won the argument against it in World War II.

Fascism in the USA

Sadly, fascism is probably appealing to a lot of Americans, even if most are still hesitant to embrace the term. It’s in our national DNA. Our Jim Crow laws and citizenship standards even provided a model for Hitler’s antisemitic campaigns. There have always been bigoted, violent people in this country, and they appreciate a ruler who reflects them. And just as they were in the 1930s, the giant industrialists who shape our politics and society are all too happy to ally themselves with fascist forces, because they know a repressive state can protect their own power from being challenged.

But there are also strains of antifascism in our DNA. My grandpa, a veteran of World War II, was antifa, as were many members of the Greatest Generation. And it’s heartening to see older folks and veterans declare themselves antifa, even in the face of Trump’s threats. It should be a source of pride that we’ve overcome many of our bigotries and xenophobias. Despite all the loud fascist voices in right-wing media and social platforms, I still believe the vast majority of people believe in basic human rights for all. The No Kings protests on October 18 were a good showing of this solidarity.

As this administration goes further off the deep end — deploying the military against American citizens; sending masked ICE agents to terrorize poor and immigrant communities; profiling, detaining, and abusing people, including American citizens, on mere suspicion of being “illegal;” and disappearing people with no trial to God-knows-where — it’s no accident that they have declared antifascism their greatest enemy.

Maybe those 38-year-old kids in the Young Republicans chat were just joking about gas chambers and loving Hitler. But given everything else this administration is doing and everything their propagandists are saying, it falls a bit too close for comfort to, “it’s funny because it’s true.”

America’s cold civil war heats up

Charlie Kirk tosses MAGA hats to the audience at his American Comeback event.

On Wednesday, the entire country witnessed the gruesome assassination of Charlie Kirk as he spoke before a crowd at Utah Valley University. His death was shocking both for the visceral nature of the gory footage and for the deep implications and ramifications it holds for America’s heated political moment.

Kirk was the cofounder of Turning Point USA, a group dedicated to converting and organizing Republican youth. He was a prolific and popular far-right commentator known for his abrasive debate style, which he typically employed against college students, as well as his enthusiastic support of President Trump and advocacy for Christian conservatism, both at the level of politics and the level of home life. 

At the moment he was killed, he was, coincidentally, debating American gun violence with an audience member – at virtually the same time as, next door in Colorado, America was hosting yet another school shooting

Obviously, there is something deeply wrong with this moment and with this country. No one can live here and not feel it if they have even a minimal level of awareness. 

So while this assassination speaks to multiple issues, including gun proliferation, it’s become a case study for our extremely elevated culture war rhetoric. And it all adds up to a grim reality: Whether we realize it or not, we are already in a cold civil war. It’s still up to us how hot it gets, but we are not currently on a course toward cooling tensions.

The pretext for increasing fascism

As of this writing, Kirk’s assassin is still on the loose. As far as we know, there is no suspect and no known motive, though that hasn’t stopped people from speculating. The natural assumption for many seems to be that one of Kirk’s political opponents committed the crime. President Trump quickly blamed “the radical left.” And while the killer may well turn out to be a leftist, Kirk had opponents on both the left and the right, including neo-Nazis

With only roaming speculation to go on, conservatives immediately called on Trump to dramatically escalate his war on “the left,” a collective that, depending on how you define it, could include literally half the country. 

  • Laura Loomer, a far-right influencer who has been in and out of Trump’s inner circle, instantly tweeted, “It’s time for the Trump administration to shut down, defund, & prosecute every single Leftist organization… Once and for all. The Left is a national security threat.” 
  • The X feed of another far-right influencer, Mike Cernovich, was filled with reactionary statements and veiled threats against “the left” broadly. 
  • The right-wing troll account, Libs of TikTok, tweeted, “THIS IS WAR”.
  • Far-right radio host Michael Savage called on Trump to revoke the broadcast license of MSNBC, essentially blaming their programming for Kirk’s assassination.

It’s not clear what crimes, exactly, Loomer wants prosecuted, and her vague phrase “Leftist organization” might include anything from the Democratic Socialists of America to the Democratic Party to a university, scientific or medical institution, or historical society. And since we have no idea at this point who the killer is, the declaration of war from Libs of TikTok could be aimed at just about anybody. In addition to these extremist takes, there have been innumerable calls for more violence from the right.

At this point, it almost doesn’t matter who killed Kirk. The stage is set, and it’ll be impossible to course-correct the narrative no matter what else we learn. But the fact that his assassination ratcheted up tensions so dramatically and so instantaneously speaks to the political moment we were already in long before he was killed — a moment Kirk himself contributed to. Some of us are simply chomping at the bit to go to war with each other.

The political violence that already surrounds us

We are in the midst of a violent political era. To take just one glaringly obvious point: President Trump has sent troops to occupy two major cities run by political opponents and regularly threatens more such actions, even using the imagery of the most brutal war movie ever made, Apocalypse Now, to describe how he plans to treat Chicagoans. 

Make no mistake: These are violent provocations. How long can Trump round up and deport people’s friends, neighbors, and coworkers, and intimidate citizens with armed troops, before some serious fighting breaks out? And if and when that happens, where will it lead? It will pour more fuel on the fascist fire, empowering Trump to reach and take a little more, necessitating ever-more forceful pushback from his opposition.

And how long can these occupations be combined with the white-hot rhetoric of the Loomers and Cernoviches of the world before something big ignites? How long before Trump decides to take their advice and declare everyone to the left of Sean Hannity an official enemy of the state, subject to searches, confiscations, imprisonment, or worse? It’s not that fantastical. His most high-profile supporters are calling for it. The shock troops are already in the streets.

Don’t let Republicans use this moment to gaslight you into thinking political violence is unique to, or primarily a feature of, the left. This is the party that turns killers like George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse into heroes. This is the party that worked on a series of bills in states around the country to protect drivers who run over protesters. This is a party that has run a 24/7 news operation for 30 years straight with some of the most incendiary, zero-sum rhetoric in the history of propaganda. Year after year, crime data is clear: right-wing extremism accounts for far more violence in America than the left.

Even beyond politics, America is an extraordinarily violent nation that visits carnage upon people all around the world. We have normalized genocide in Palestine, revealing ourselves as a nation that just doesn’t care much about the worst form of violence imaginable. And at home, we have all but grown accustomed to regular massacres of our schoolchildren. Even Kirk once said, in a quote that went viral after his assassination, “I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.”

Just who was Charlie Kirk?

Because of some of his past remarks, some observers found Kirk’s end poetic. You don’t have to look too hard to find people openly celebrating on social media. I won’t do that, but I also won’t write a fawning eulogy for a man whose impact on the country, and the world, was so toxic and grim.

Kirk’s operation, TPUSA, was funded by dark money from oligarchs, fossil fuel companies, and big business. His function as a propagandist was to inflame the tensions of culture wars, goading working-class people into bitter fights with one another over trans bathrooms or “traditional marriage” while shielding the high-level crimes of power — things like looting the lower and middle class, shredding our social safety nets, and bankrupting our national trust through global imperialism and war.

Kirk died doing what he loved best: debating a liberal. And he was debating him in his usual style, injecting polemic rhetoric to confuse and frustrate his interlocutor. He was pushing an idea that trans mass shooters are a major problem, and in the process inciting more hatred for trans people, despite them committing a vanishingly small proportion of mass shootings in America. 

Even in this one example, the last words of his life, we can see that Kirk did not engage in good-faith debate. He was not in the business of productive dialogue that brings Americans together. In the wake of his murder, outlets have been compiling some of his greatest hits, including:

  • On the military occupation of America’s streets: “We got to go hard. We got to go big league. We’re talking National Guard, tanks – every street, you need military.”
  • On affirmative action and successful Black women: “You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to be taken somewhat seriously.”
  • On the civil rights movement: “MLK was awful… This guy is not worthy of a national holiday,” and, “We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”
  • On the role of women: “Maybe one of the reasons that Taylor Swift has been so annoyingly liberal over the last couple of years is that she’s not yet married, and she doesn’t have children… Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”
  • On the genocide in Gaza: “They brought it upon themselves.”
  • On trans people, a favorite and perennial target: “Against the natural law… A throbbing middle finger to god.”

One could go on and on. And, to be fair, if you comb through thousands of hours of recorded dialogue from almost anybody, you will find some nuggets that look ugly. But the picture is consistently clear, and this rotten philosophy has undoubtedly contributed to hate and division in America.

What comes next?

Trump has called on the nation to fly flags at half-mast in honor of Kirk’s memory. This is another provocative, political move. Kirk was the victim of a terrible act of violence, yes. He was also a bad-faith propagandist who put mental poison into the world. Both things can be true, and neither one changes the other. We can condemn violence without compelling people to mourn someone who called their existence an abomination. If you’re conflicted about it all, remember Kirk’s own words: “I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage.”

We should not let Kirk’s death ignite more violence. Sadly, we have a president who is possibly the poorest-equipped person in history to provide a steady hand and guide us to calmer waters. Instead, he could use it as justification to ramp up his occupation of American cities, recruit more angry conservatives to his masked army of ICE agents, restrict voting and speech rights, and make other fascistic moves. Plenty of his most fervent acolytes are already pushing him in this direction.

I see nothing good in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. His rhetoric harmed this nation and the marginalized groups he targeted, and that deserves to be his legacy. But his murder does nothing to address the wrongs they face. It only rockets tensions through the roof and brings this country closer to an extremely ugly and dangerous edge. It empowers the worst, most fascistic impulses of an already dangerous administration. 

Things may simmer back down, but this is not a stable equilibrium for a nation to be in. Maybe something needs to break. Returning to normal is not an option. Normal is what brought us here. For my entire life, “normal” has been a relentless march toward increasing inequality and nonstop war. That’s nothing to look forward to for a society in the midst of a fundamental transformation. 

But it would surely be in everyone’s best interest not to erupt into a full-scale civil war. Your imagination is as good as mine at conjuring the horrors that might entail. The best thing is for people to realize their common interests, let one another live in peace and dignity, and oppose the forces in America that are selling our futures down the river — forces for whom Charlie Kirk was a devoted and effective sower of division.

South Park cracks the code for dealing with fascists

For ten years, opponents of President Donald Trump have struggled to adequately deal with his myriad abuses and scandals. When you run through the litany of crimes, lies, Constitutional violations, and cover-ups, you can’t help but sound like a complainer. Many Americans simply tire of hearing about it all, while MAGA supporters retreat to their own impenetrable infotainment ecosystem.

Maybe, then, the answer isn’t to give more persuasive arguments, but to simply show the Trump Administration for what it is, using the most grotesque, over-the-top caricatures possible.

That’s exactly what South Park has been doing in its new season. The second episode, “Got a Nut,” goes straight for the jugular with numerous high-ranking MAGA officials. It includes depictions of:

  • Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem as a puppy-shooting ghoul with a melting face.
  • ICE as a masked, bumbling goon squad violently rounding up innocent people for explicitly racial reasons.
  • MAGA propagandist Charlie Kirk as an obnoxious racist obsessed with “master-debating” college girls.
  • Vice President JD Vance as the James Bond villain Nick Nack, a completely servile troll.
  • President Donald Trump as the crime boss behind it all, hiding out in his Florida palace with underage masseuses and his lover, Satan himself.

South Park doesn’t call these people names or point out their crimes in an articulately worded essay. It shows them in action doing despicable things, providing a window for MAGA, if they care to look, into how everyone who’s not inside the cult views these monsters.

Showing, not telling

The South Park approach is far more potent than the fact-based appeals journalists have made. As multiple scholars and thinkers have observed, such facts are ineffective against fascists like Trump for the simple reason that the fascist appeal is not to truth or logic in the first place, but to base emotion. This is why MAGA is primarily a coalition built around vague fears and anxiety over the loss of some intangible cultural quality (read: “traditional values,” typically a stand-in for whiteness, straightness, or some other perceived “normal” thing). Information doesn’t change their mind, because their beliefs aren’t rooted in truth.

For instance, it wouldn’t matter to a fascist that the vast majority of immigrants, documented or otherwise, are law-abiding, contributing members of society. The MAGA base simply does not want them here, and they aren’t interested in anybody’s circumstances or story or what the evidence says. So Trump is building a massive, secret army to round up dark-skinned immigrants in brutal ways, terrorizing communities by dragging people from their homes and public spaces in front of children and others, sending them off to foreign concentration camps in places like El Salvador. 

Words can’t adequately express the horror of this. It’s more poignant to convey the horror by showing it. And right now, only South Park is showing it in the truly ghastly way it needs to be shown. 

In the latest episode, a squad of untrained ICE goons raids a Dora the Explorer Live show, and even Heaven itself, to remove every last brown person. When new ICE recruit Mr. Mackey insists his job isn’t to “round up Mexicans” but rather to “detain foreigners who might be illegal,” the man he’s talking to sarcastically says, “OK!” – as in, “Sure, whatever you say, pal!” Kristi Noem’s face constantly melts off, only to be repaired by a makeup team in time for a photo op, underscoring MAGA’s obsession with superficial aesthetics. She also shoots every puppy she sees. Cartman and Clyde act as stand-ins for Charlie Kirk, abrasive, dimwitted pricks who win debates through nonstop verbal diarrhea. And poor Dora winds up massaging a creepy old billionaire at Mar-a-Lago, a decadent den of sin and corruption staffed mostly by teenage girls.

Without pulling a single punch, South Park executes the most cutting satire of MAGA yet, with plenty of humor and a good story throughout. It’s not even showing these people at their worst, it’s showing them for what they are. People inside the cult can’t see it. Even if they could, many wouldn’t care, and would support even more explicitly racist and violent policies. But for the few who can be reached, this is a visceral way to do it.

The call from inside the house

South Park has another advantage that makes it the perfect vehicle for this satire. The show has long been viewed, rightly or wrongly, as right wing-coded. Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone aren’t wishy-washy, whiny, bleeding-heart liberals. They’ve always been politically incorrect, which has made South Park a rare common ground for both thoughtful social critics and boorish right-wing assholes alike.

Of course, Trump is also politically incorrect. It is surely politically incorrect to racially target human beings for extraordinary rendition, grab unwilling women “by the pussy,” be best friends with Jeffrey Epstein, and attempt an insurrection at the Capitol when you lose an election. But does that make these things good? Parker and Stone, perhaps unlike MAGA, realize that the answer is no.

Until now, MAGA may have thought Parker and Stone were on their side. This new season shows, definitively, that they’re not. They clearly see the Trump Administration as a rank, criminal cabal that has gone so far off the rails that they have no idea where the rails even are anymore. This is what MAGA supports: psychopaths who shoot puppies, racist goons eager to abuse anyone with darker skin than Ed Sheeran, and a reckless authoritarian running the nation from a decadent compound in Florida.

The show probably won’t get through to anyone in MAGA or change any minds, simply because minds in America don’t change easily. Some will laugh it off and ignore the meaning behind the jokes. Others will just say South Park has gone woke. But it’s inspiring to see creators tackle the Trump era in this way. It may sometimes be petty, and it may sometimes be juvenile, but let’s not forget who we’re dealing with here. They deserve no better.

I’ve been writing about politics since before the Trump era, and I’ve tried to give a balanced assessment from the beginning. And the balanced assessment is: He’s an absolute monster. Sometimes I get tired of researching and writing articles, of presenting facts that MAGA is programmed to ignore anyway, and I just want to scream: “This is a sleazy, corrupt toad of a man surrounded by lying, shameless sycophants and stupid, violent bigots, and I am rapidly losing patience and respect for anyone who can’t see it.” What I struggle to express in a journalistic essay, South Park makes plain as day with their utterly savage satire. They have truly captured the essence of this administration, revealing it for the depraved, demented carnival it is.

Satire and ridicule are far more effective weapons against fascism than reasoned arguments. We need far more of it. Since these people do not engage ethically or honestly, the best way to deal with them is with mockery and contempt. Forget trying to reach MAGA with kindness or understanding. Hold the mirror up to them instead. If there’s any humanity left, they won’t like what they see.

The depths of depravity of Donald J. Trump

As the 2024 election speeds to a close, Democratic candidate Vice President Kamala Harris’s closing argument against former President Donald Trump is this: He’s a fascist, a threat to democracy, and too dangerous to elect.

That argument holds a lot of weight, but it has two big problems. One is that Democrats have been making this argument for nine years, with mixed results at best. Two is that Trump served as President for four years and did not become a full authoritarian — though not for lack of trying.

With the election apparently so close, it may feel like political malpractice to trot out the same unpersuasive argument and allow Trump to come so close to the White House again. But in all the furor and focus on his latest politically incorrect outrage, it can be easy to lose sight of the simple truth: This man is extremely dangerous and corrupt, and he must not be allowed back into the White House.

The “fascist” question

Almost everyone, including historians and political scientists, have slightly varying definitions of fascism, and even historical fascist societies differed in certain meaningful ways. In modern American political dialect, it basically means, “Anyone who makes me do something I don’t like,” from filing taxes to stopping at red lights. This makes calling Trump a fascist problematic, even if the shoe fits.

Nonetheless, there are a few distinguishing features that most conceptions of fascism share.

  • Authoritarian rule. Power concentrated in a leader with a devoted cult of personality, in whom people see a living embodiment of the nation
  • Police state. A militarized society, including citizen militias and police suppression of protests, speech, and other forms of dissent
  • Propaganda. Rampant propaganda that is rife with lies, conspiracy, and dehumanizing language
  • Censorship. Dissent or open disagreement with official narratives and state policies may be outlawed and punished violently
  • In-group vs. out-group. Hatred of “others,” such as immigrants, the LGBTQ community, leftists, or academics
  • National and cultural mythology. Desire to preserve or attain “purity” of culture, language, and/or race and ethnicity, often through appeals to a mythical past
  • Hyper-capitalism. The merger of the state with corporations and business leaders
  • War. Jingoism and an aggressive foreign policy

Any honest, informed person can see how much of this applies to Trump. His authoritarian ambitions and cult of personality are no secret. He uses dehumanizing rhetoric on his enemies and on immigrants, calling them “vermin,” “scum,” and “the enemy within” that is “poisoning the blood of our country.” He has threatened to revoke the broadcast licenses of news organizations critical of him. On January 6, 2021, he incited a mob to attempt to halt the peaceful transfer of power after losing an election. And despite his talk of peace, he pursued a hawkish foreign policy rife with war crimes.

Of course, America itself is fascistic in many ways. We are a right-wing, corporate-run nation with a militarized police force that protects ruling class interests. We wage, fund, and arm more war than any other nation, with nearly unanimous, bipartisan support. Our media and education systems exalt American exceptionalism while stoking reactionary paranoias about declared enemies.

But with his overt hostility toward criticism, utter amorality, and willingness to do anything to stay in power, Trump pushes the fascist envelope further than any conventional American politician. And there is every indication he is ready and emboldened to go even further if he gets back into office. Whether he’s a textbook fascist or not is beside the point. He is a Trumpist, and that is plenty dangerous enough.

Corruption, loud and proud

If one key component of fascism is the merging of corporations and the government, Trump is the personification of it. A walking, talking brand brought to life, he’s blurred the lines between business and state like none before him — often flaunting his open corruption of public institutions. He put corporate donors in charge of the very parts of government they most wanted to destroy, including climate change denier Scott Pruitt at the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, for-profit school fanatic Betsy DeVos in the Department of Education, and Exxon-Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State.

Some of the signature moments of Trump’s 2016 campaign came when he acknowledged his first-hand dealings with the corruption of Washington— by bragging that he paid off politicians and used loopholes to dodge his taxes. It felt like a populist moment, as if Trump was saying, “I’ve been inside the belly of the beast, so I know how to fight it.” But Trump didn’t see the light and become Robin Hood. Before, during, and after his presidency, he has been one of the most crooked and corrupt people in history.

Not only does Trump not pay his taxes, he doesn’t pay his bills, either. There are hundreds of stories of contractors, workers, and professionals claiming they were stiffed by Trump. His campaign doesn’t even pay the venues and cities where it holds rallies. Just as one example, they currently owe the city of Albuquerque more than $444,000.

Perhaps most prominently, he was convicted of 34 felonies for falsifying business records earlier in 2024. In 2016, shortly before assuming office, he was ordered to pay $21 million in restitution to Americans defrauded by his Trump University scam. Trump’s charity was shuttered and a court ordered him to pay $2 million for misusing its funds to, among other things, purchase a portrait of himself. Since leaving office Trump has sold his name to NFT and cryptocurrency scams, collectors’ coins, and even a line of Chinese-made Trump bibles.

Even more seriously, Trump took money from foreign governments throughout his presidency, including Saudi Arabia, China, Qatar, Turkey, and others. According to a congressional letter investigating these payments, “Each of these countries sought — and in many cases obtained — favors and specific policy outcomes from [Trump and his] Administration while they made these payments.” Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, accepted a whopping $2 billion investment from Saudi Arabia. More recently, Trump all but openly sold the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, a position in his administration after Musk pledged to donate $45 million a month to Trump’s campaign.

As one final matter in Trump’s long saga of dishonesty and criminality, there is his close association with convicted pedophile and sex trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. Some details are sordid and unsubstantiated, but Trump’s history of sexual abuse allegations, photos showing him at parties with Epstein, and public comments he’s made about Epstein being a “terrific guy” who likes girls “on the younger side” are certainly disturbing. It’s a testament to Trump’s political prowess and control over his supporters that MAGA, which is usually obsessed with Epstein stories and celebrity pedophilia, completely looks the other way.

This is a man who has lied and ripped off Americans his entire life. His primary reason for seeking office appears to be shielding himself from the civil and criminal investigations his fraudulent behavior has kicked up — as well as enacting the far-right agenda of his fascistic, corporate enablers.

Second time around

Trump was already president for four years, and although he did enormous damage, the nation survived. Plenty of pundits therefore argue that hysteria over a second Trump term is unwarranted. That may be so. Nobody can predict the future. But there is also plenty of reason to expect him to be much worse this time around: unleashed, emboldened, and screaming for vengeance.

There’s little doubt Trump would’ve liked to follow his fascist instincts further in his first term. Dozens of former Trump Administration officials attest to this, including prominent ones like General John Kelly and former Vice President Mike Pence. Pence, for instance, refused to help Trump overturn the 2020 election. And when Trump phoned Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and asked him to “find” enough votes for Trump to win the state, Kemp likewise refused.

But those guardrails, whether they be “normal” bureaucrats, courts, or other institutions, only barely held. Trump surrounded himself with people willing to kowtow to him and carry out most of his worst orders — but many of them had at least a minimal consideration for the appearances of a civil democracy. Trump himself has no regard for those appearances, nor, seemingly, does JD Vance or the cadre of far-right extremists on board the campaign this go-round. MAGA also has a much better sense of what they can get away with now. Guardrails are only really maintained by people. Those people won’t be there this time.

Reelecting Trump will give him a mandate, and he will see it as validation for his worst impulses, which have been on full display during the campaign — such as his amplification of a neo-Nazi hoax that Haitian immigrants eat neighborhood cats and dogs in Ohio. A potential blueprint for a Trump Administration can be found in Project 2025, a far-right fever dream of authoritarianism, corporatism, and retrograde theocracy. He’s also expressed a desire for more extreme forms of fascism, including rounding up and deporting millions of human beings and interning them in detention camps.

Perhaps the most dangerous aspect of Trump is the devotion he inspires in supporters. After nine years, they still believe his every lie. They want him to go further. They are willing to storm the Capital and perhaps far more on his behalf. He’s impervious to facts; any criticism, including this entire article, can be easily shrugged off by a built-in defense mechanism that reassures supporters that any negative story is a liberal media lie.

Reading about Trump’s runaway criminality and abuses is exhausting. This article only scratches the surface, and it’s tempting to simply tune out. For nine years Democrats have failed to present a positive alternative. The media, too, have largely failed by focusing more on petty drama and personal flaws. But the odiousness of Trump is, in fact, the best argument against him. He is an amoral, fascistic, crooked, serially unfaithful, and pathologically dishonest man. Apart from his reprehensible character, his corporatist, militarist policies and authoritarian ambitions will be immensely destructive to the working class, the environment, and the world.

Felony convictions can’t take him down. His supporters cannot be swayed. The ballot is America’s best hope of ridding Trump from the conversation — at least for the next four years.

A way of understanding America’s civil unrest

mpd burning

People run in front of the Minneapolis Police Department, 3rd Precinct, as it burns in the background.

Cities across the country have erupted in protest following a spate of police killings of unarmed black people – most prominently George Floyd, but also Breonna Taylor, Tony McDade, Dion Johnson, and others. Police have attacked crowds with teargas, rubber bullets, batons, and vehicles. Rioters have burned buildings and looted stores. People have been seriously injured and several have been killed.

Amid the chaos, President Trump has quadrupled down on his most authoritarian instincts. He’s frequently screamed “LAW & ORDER!” in all-caps tweets. Trump urged the nation’s governors to “get much tougher,” “dominate,” and jail protesters for “five years or ten years” so that “you’ll never see this stuff again.” He deployed the military in Washington, D.C., and threatened to use the 101st Airborne against American citizens in American streets.

The history of black oppression in America is too long for any one article, but it’s critical to understand it in order to grasp the facts of the current unrest. Racism is thoroughly baked into the history, culture, and consciousness of America. Many police forces began as slave patrols hunting down escaped slaves and then as segregation enforcers. Civil rights legislation in the 1960s formally outlawed discrimination, but did little to address the legacy of centuries of abuse, poverty, and bigotry. To this day, fully 400 years after the first slave came to America, blacks face well-documented discrimination in housing, education, business, banking, media, and of course, the justice system. Continue reading

A view of the restraint of President Trump

trump

President Trump has held firm to his position of unilaterally holding the federal government hostage for his border wall, much to the delight of his base.

The presidency of tabloid star, game show host, and brand entrepreneur Donald J. Trump has been a rowdy one. Currently, the federal government of the United States is, like so many of Trump’s former ventures, shut down. As Trump threatens to declare a national emergency and circumvent Congress in order to build his promised southern border wall, commentators are speculating just how far Trump will go to undermine American institutions and empower himself.

Throughout his many decades of public life, Trump has been openly petty, vulgar, racist, conspiratorial, and narcissistic. The presidency hasn’t matured him an iota. As president, he’s continued to lie, flirt with dictators, enrich himself and his family, and show no compunction about stripping away benefits and even disaster relief from vulnerable people. Given how brazenly he’s gotten away with it all, though, it’s almost a marvel that he hasn’t gone even further. Continue reading

Republicans plead for civility

Sanders

Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked to leave the Red Hen restaurant, an incident that became a flashpoint in the culture war.

For three years, Donald Trump has dominated America’s cultural conversation. In that time, he has accused Mexico of sending rapists and drug dealers over the border, mocked a disabled reporter’s handicap, encouraged his crowds to physically assault protesters, and labeled journalists the “enemy of the people.” As President, he has done all he can to shred America’s life-saving social safety net, banned Muslims from entering America, and held migrant children hostage in cages. Now, Trump and his enablers are asking for one thing: civility. Continue reading

Trump Administration dehumanizes victims to justify border atrocities

child prison

After being separated from their parents at the border, the children of migrants are held in chain-link pens at military bases and prisons around the southern border.

By far the biggest story in national headlines this week was the Trump Administration’s policy of splitting up families crossing the southern border without authorization. Following a zero-tolerance policy enacted in April by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, detained parents have been sent to one facility and their children have been sent to another. Photos and videos of those children – confused, crying, and locked in cages – drew intense domestic and international condemnation. United Nations high commissioner for human rights, Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, said, “The thought that any state would seek to deter parents by inflicting such abuse on children is unconscionable.” Continue reading

America’s new battle with Nazism is only beginning

pete

Self-described “identitarian” Peter Cvjetanovic denies being a racist. His face went viral as he marched alongside torch-bearing neo-Nazis and white supremacists.

Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, the alt-right – call them what you will, this group of angry, white men had a busy weekend. Hundreds of them descended on Charlottesville, Virginia, for a Unite the Right rally. Demonstrators began a torchlit march on Friday night and by Saturday had turned the city into a warzone, culminating in an act of right-wing terror that caused one death and injured 19 others. In response, President Trump couldn’t bring himself to denounce one side more than any other. Continue reading

Violence at Berkeley is less about free speech than it is white nationalism

mcinnes

Gavin McInnes, founder of the political street gang Proud Boys, reads what would have been Ann Coulter’s speech at Berkeley.

On April 27, far-right polemicist Ann Coulter was scheduled to give a speech at the University of California at Berkeley. After a lot of back-and-forth, during which Coulter was disinvited, re-invited and rescheduled, the group that sponsored her ultimately backed out. Security concerns, including a near-guarantee of violence, prompted both Coulter and the Young America’s Foundation to decide that her appearance would jeopardize people’s well-being. In a statement, Coulter said, “It’s a sad day for free speech.” Continue reading